Contributed by Rep. David Eastman
Five people were shot after a political attack against members of my government took place outside of DC. A man asked if the people playing baseball were Republicans or Democrats. Then he started shooting.
When UAA professor, Thomas Chung, recently painted Captain America holding up the severed head of my president and then put that painting on display at the University of Alaska, we were reassured that the act itself was not an act of violence and that no one was hurt by it. He was simply channeling his grief at the outcome of the election.
When Americans were attacked and beat up for attending rallies in support of our future president, we could at least be reminded that it wasn’t armed conflict and that no one had been killed. Nothing to worry about, right?
Then a professor in the DC area declared to the world that Republicans in Congress, “…should be lined up and shot. That’s not hyperbole...” Maybe he didn’t mean it, some said.
What do we tell ourselves now, after a man terrorized Americans at a baseball practice because he found their politics unacceptable? What do we tell ourselves now that a congressman has been shot and is still listed in serious condition? What do we tell ourselves after some responded to the attack, “It’s a shame more Republicans weren’t shot.” and a Democrat Party official in Nebraska declared publicly, “I’m glad he got shot. I wish he was f****ing dead.”?
Running for office is expected to have its share of challenges of course - public criticism, late nights, early mornings, time away from family, etc. But the thought of getting shot isn’t something most elected officials have had to wrestle with. In that, we have been blessed.
But something profound is happening in America today. A powerful segment of our society has decided that it is not enough to disagree politically and it’s not enough to sort things out on Election Day. Disagreements have always been with us of course, even profound ones. That’s nothing new. What is new today is the number of Americans and politicians who have abandoned resolving those disagreements and instead resort to condemnation.
What is new today is the number of Americans who have lost the capacity to let their ideas be challenged without seeing such challenges as a threat to their person, as a threat to their safety. While they are glad to publicly celebrate the defeat of their political opponents on Election Day, they need a “safe space” if one of their candidates loses. Their political opponents are said to be so evil that unprovoked violence against them is now justified. “My opponent makes me feel afraid. I shouldn’t have to feel afraid. Someone please shoot him.”
A college president in Washington just asked state police for help in restoring order on campus after a white professor insisted on teaching his class on a day when all white people were told to leave campus. We have reached a very low point indeed, when the only way to avoid violence is to physically remove an entire race of people from an American college campus.
In political terms, we are witnessing what happens when Americans begin to lose trust in the ability of our political processes to negotiate acceptable terms of peace between warring factions. In some countries, violence and threats of violence are how political differences are resolved. America was conceived in the idea that constitutional government provides an escape from such terrors. You see, freedom of speech doesn’t just protect the person speaking. In the end, it protects all of us, because it preserves the space necessary to communicate and resolve passionate, even offensive disagreements. Political correctness destroys that possibility.
Curtailing free speech, no matter how altruistic the motivation, deprives us of a critical tool in preventing violence. The framers of our Constitution witnessed that violence firsthand in the years leading up to the American Revolution, and then over the course of seven bloody years of armed conflict. With that experience in mind, they left us with tools - a system of checks and balances, to slow and even pacify the rush to resolve political issues through violence and the threat of violence.
Over the years, we have watched as many of those checks and balances have been laid to waste, and as succeeding generations have received less and less training in tools that were at one time simply an assumed part of the American Experiment. And as judges and bureaucrats have come to exercise more and more power, our legislative process no longer seems to hold the same importance it once did. As bizarre as it sounds, our laws no longer carry the force of law today. And our elected officials no longer feel bound by them as they once did. The growing fear that a judge or justice will step in to overturn a law or the result of an election, for whatever reason, has hastened the erosion of confidence that everyday Americans still have in our laws, and in the political process that is supposed to determine what those laws will be.
Events like the attack at the ballfield and the responses to it, confirm that our situation is most dire. While civil war is not necessarily right around the corner, we should recognize that we are already many steps down the path towards such a possibility. Now is not the time to simply comfort the survivors of these types of attacks. Yes, comfort survivors. Yes, recognize the heroism and bravery of those who intervened and stopped the attacker. But also ask yourself what actions you and I can take today to alter this course and to recover the confidence in our political institutions that has been lost.
Loss of confidence is not simply a marketing problem. It will require more than an expensive PR campaign. It will require fundamental reforms and hard work to bring those reforms about. It will require sacrifice on the part of many of us. As President Reagan reminded the generation of his day, “Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn’t pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children’s children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.”
In the end, when our political institutions are working properly, they serve a valuable function: They provide our communities with tools to resolve the political differences that will always be with us, but only if those institutions are working properly. As Americans, it is our job to ensure that they are.
Rep. David Eastman represents rural Mat-Su House District 10. He ran on a platform of fighting for genuine conservative reform, fiscally and socially, and remains committed to delivering on that promise.